|

|
|
WELCOME TO WILDLIFE
ONLINE
Last Updated: 11th
January
2012
|

LATEST NEWS
January is well underway and first off I would
like to wish all my readers and their families a very Happy New Year! Hopefully
2012 will be a good, perhaps wild, one for you. Now, if -- like me
-- you are in the habit of making resolutions at the start of the New Year, you
may be trying to work out what you can do to improve your life for the coming
year. My suggestion: get out and experience the amazing spectacles
and species that Nature has to offer. Forget the gym. If you feel you need the
exercise, perhaps volunteer with your local wildlife conservation group and help
with some of their chores. A day of clearing scrub from a nature reserve will
leave you feeling just as exhausted as a session in the gym, but at the end
you’ll be safe in the knowledge that you’ve done something eminently worthwhile
and will more than likely have made some new friends in the process.
If this takes your fancy contact
The Wildlife
Trusts, the
Forestry Commission, the
National Trust, the
British
Trust for Conservation Volunteers or your local Natural History
society/group. If you have already decided that you want to get out
and experience Nature this year, you have probably started drawing up a list of
the places you want to visit and the species you want to see. With
that in mind, here are a few species to look out for this month.
January
is a good month for mammal spotting, not because they are particularly active
(indeed many species hibernate or substantially reduce their activity during
winter), but because the lack of foliage makes it easier to spot them.
Rodents are very active at the moment; with insect prey still relatively scarce
(although it is still very mild and I’ve noticed quite a few flying insects
still on the wing) it is not unusual to see mice and voles feeding on seed spilt
from bird feeders. Similarly, squirrels are busy recovering caches
that they made during the autumn and this can be fascinating to watch,
especially if there are corvids in the vicinity, which will often sidle up to
squirrels and harass them while they’re feeding. One mammal that is
particularly active at the moment is the Red fox – we’re in the height of the
breeding season now and many people will now be hearing much calling, although
the foxes themselves are seldom seen during daylight. Come the end
of February, many vixens will be excavating a natal earth in which to give birth
to cubs. If you’re hoping to get some views of your local foxes,
early mornings are the best times and, when conditions are cold and there has
been a hard frost voles become more diurnal (i.e. active during the daytime); as
a consequence, so do foxes. Badgers are also breeding at this time
of year, although they spend more time underground during periods of cold
weather, which can make them difficult to spot. Despite being
‘indoors’ for longer, they don't hibernate. Hedgehogs (dormice and
bats, too), on the other hand, do hibernate. Despite the mild
conditions, my local hedgehogs have disappeared (although I know some people
still have them visiting their feeders) and I take this to mean that they’re now
deep in hibernation and will hopefully stay there until Spring arrives.
It should, however, be emphasised that hibernation is not a continuous process
and, if it gets very cold, hedgehogs will rouse from hibernation to search for
food (if the temperature in the hibernaculum drops below 1oC, the
hedgehogs are in danger of freezing to death). Consequently, it is
not unusual to find hedgehogs out and about on very cold nights. Finding a
hedgehog active during the day, however, is usually a sign that it needs
veterinary attention. See Natasha Harper’s article on Caring for
Hedgehogs, for more information. Given that many hedgehogs will now be in
hibernation, if you're planning on having a winter bonfire,
PLEASE take a moment to
CHECK ALL GARDEN RUBBISH PILES FOR HEDGEHOGS BEFORE
LIGHTING THEM. Piles of lopped branches, leaves and other
plant matter are a mighty tempting spot for hedgehogs to 'snooze' away these
winter months and every year many -- probably well into the thousands -- are
killed when people light their bonfires without checking first. It may sound
simple, but a couple of minutes of your time could save a hedgehog's life!
Finally, January is a good time to look for deer. Chinese Water deer
are still rutting at the moment, which can make it easier to track down this
otherwise elusive species. Other deer species have completed their
ruts, although the males of most (Red, Fallow and Sika) will still be in antler
and large groups may be encountered. Roe bucks are in the process of
shedding and re-growing their antlers in time for their rut in the late summer.
January
is a good birding month, with many predatory birds in evidence in our woodlands,
marshes and heaths. Hen Harrier (right) and Marsh Harriers are
particularly evident at this time of year and I have recently had the pleasure
of watching a male Hen harrier hunting over a patch of heather on the New
Forest. There are also some Great Grey shrikes about at the moment,
as well as a bumper crop of Short-eared owls, which are beautiful to watch but
-- owing largely to their lack of contrast against the reeds over which they
hunt -- can be the nemesis of the photographer (as I experienced just before
Christmas!). There are also plenty of waterfowl around at the
moment, with wigeon, teal, shelducks, numerous species of geese, avocets,
sandpipers and shovelers being among those on my ‘to see’ list this month.
There also appear to be quite a few Great Crested grebes around; some are still
in summer plumage, although most seem now to be in their winter regalia (top).
It can often be worth taking a trip to your local pond, lake or reservoir just
to see what’s about. I’ve been to Southampton Common plenty of times
in the past, but never really gave the lakes much thought, naively thinking that
ponds in the middle of a large city would just support the usual mallards,
coots, moorhens and seagulls. Over Christmas, however, I decided to
take a closer look and, although there were plenty of the aforementioned, I was
also treated to a heron, tufted ducks, pochards and a stunning male mandarin
duck (below). There were also various small birds (Long-tailed tits,
robins, even a bullfinch), a sparrowhawk and mammals (mainly Brown rats) around
the pond, which were interesting to watch. So, however mundane you
expect the wildlife on your local pond, or in your local park to be, it is
always worth taking a walk to check it out. Better still, try
visiting on different days and at different times to improve your chances of
seeing something interesting. Keeping a note of what you see and
when you see it each year can make an interesting record of the wildlife on your
local patch – such records are often highly prized by local Natural History
groups.
If you prefer something a little more sedate to
get you started for the year, the mild winter has meant that there are still
some fungi about and several plant species, particularly snowdrops it would
seem, are in bloom already. January is also a good month to seek out
the often overlooked fungi-algae collaboration, more commonly known as lichen.
Website-wise,
things are now getting back on track after something of a hiatus over Christmas.
The penultimate section of the Red fox article is nearing completion and I have
now had confirmation from a couple of people (including the eminent mammalogist
Professor David Macdonald) that I can use some of their photos to accompany the
article, so I’m confident it will be worth all the time and effort.
One of the Q/As that is waiting in the wings to go online discusses the
phenomenon of Samson foxes. The Samson condition is a rare genetic
defect that causes the fox to fail to grow guard hairs, giving it an almost
'woolly' appearance with just the underfur. Earlier this month, WLOL
reader Staci Wood got in touch and sent me a photo of a Samson fox that
has been visiting her garden in North Carolina since Christmas.
Fascinating to get a glimpse of such a rare animal - thank you, Staci.
Some more of her trailcam photos will accompany the Q/A when it goes live
shortly. The redesign is also progressing and I’m in the process of
converting all the existing pages into the new format. The
Wildlife
Online gallery on Flickr has been updated with some photos taken over the
festive break and will continue to be updated regularly with photos I have taken
when I should actually have been indoors working on the fox article!
At the moment the galleries only contain my attempts at wildlife photography,
many quite poor, but I am looking at expanding it to include contributed photos
too. As always, I love hearing from readers; any queries or comments
regarding the information on the site can be sent in using the addresses on the
Contact page (Note: Some website questions are answered on the FAQ, while many
animal-related questions are covered in the Q/A). Photos can be
e-mailed to a dedicated e-mail address - please keep them coming and don't
forget to check out my Photos Needed page. I'm also interested in
hearing any reports of unusual behaviour in any of the animals featured on this
site, or interactions between humans and wildlife.

********************************************************************
Okay, for those of you that are new to the site, let's take
it from the top!
What
is Wildlife Online?
Essentially, WLOL is an educational website about British wildlife. The
site contains profiles of various British animal species, with new articles in
preparation all the time. The site also has articles looking at
wildlife-related subjects, including hunting and animal emotions. This site is
purely a hobby of mine; it does not generate any money or contain any
advertising, and I am happy for it to stay that way.
What
does Wildlife Online aim to achieve?
The ultimate goal of the website is to be useful. My intention has always
been to provide un-biased, accurate information that’s accessible to anyone with
an Internet connection. Increasingly people are coming into contact with their
local wildlife and whether such interactions are positive or negative, they
generally inspire a desire to learn more about the species. Moreover, there
are still a great many misconceptions surrounding our wildlife (fox behaviour springs
immediately to mind) and these are brought up time and time again during
discussions in the media. Each article aims to provide a reasonably
comprehensive overview of the species in question by drawing on information from
the media, books, TV programmes and the scientific literature. I
feel that this combination of sources, along with my own observations and those
of my friends/colleagues/readers provides a unique online resource of British
wildlife information. My hope is that the information provided here
will go some way to changing people's perceptions of the creatures with which
they share their parks and gardens.
Why
create a website when there are books and TV programmes about your subjects?
Books can be a fantastic resource and I can't image being without my
library. Not all libraries, however, are equally well stocked, and not everyone has the funds to
splash out on what are often very expensive wildlife books (especially those written by scientists).
More importantly, much of the
scientific research never makes it out of the journals into books and TV shows.
Similarly, many of the early books -- which contain some of the pioneering work
on the species -- are now long out of print and can be difficult or
expensive to track down. Books have the 'luxury' of being able to
devote their entire contents to a particular species, covering all aspects of
its life history. Television, by contrast, is a much more limited
and variable medium: the programme editor(s) has to create a show that is likely to hold the viewers' attention and
appeal to a very wide audience. The result is that, although some reach this
compromise very well (the BBC, for example), many documentaries focus heavily on
the 'wow factor' (multitudinous slow motion shots of Great whites leaping out of
the water in pursuit of seals, for example) and this often comes at the
inevitable expense of the information about the animal. Finally, both books
and TV programmes go out of date quite quickly; new research is always being
conducted. Consequently, a website is an ideal intermediate - it offers the
opportunity to provide a decent amount of information about the subject that can
be updated at the metaphorical drop-of-a-hat as any new research is published.
Why
include so much information?
I honestly believe that if a job is worth doing, it's worth doing well.
There are hundreds of websites with brief species profiles and if that's all
WLOL offered there would be little point to it. I understand and appreciate
that some people are of the 'too long; didn't read' mind-set and will thus be
turned off by the amount of text facing them. I have tried to remedy this as
far as possible: there is a Speed Read section with a brief profile of
each species featured in a main article, and each article has been 'virtually
split' with the aid of hyperlinks into sections that allow people to easily jump
to the information they're looking for. I wish to provide as much information
as is feasible and I hope that most readers approve of this approach.
Why
haven't you included a complete bibliography?
My intention with WLOL is to provide the information in an accessible
format, which means that anyone should be able to read an article and understand
the information in it. Consequently, I didn't want to format it as a
scientific paper because the current format allows for a much more informal
approach and writing style which, I hope, will appeal to a wider audience.
Most people should find enough information in the article (I typically provide
the name or one or more of the authors and the journal and year) to track down
the original scientific paper. When I take information from books, I always
give the name of the author(s) and the full title of the book for easy
reference. I am also happy to provide full details of any of the references
upon request.
Are
you really qualified to do this?
I'm
certainly not an expert on any of the subjects presented on this site. The
articles stem from my varied interests in natural history and biological
sciences. In terms of qualifications, I trained as a scientist (studying
natural sciences at degree and postgraduate level) and all I really do is
interpret information, blend it with associated research and personal
observation, and present it in what
I hope is an accessible format. Unless specifically stated, I do not claim any of the information on this
site to be my own research. I have built relationships with some researchers
producing the data that I use and I am happy either to recommend an expert or
provide my own opinions on a subject.
As a final
note, I want to make a quick reference to the quality of the material on the
site. The great French philosopher and mathematician, Rene Descartes, once
said: "If you would be a real seeker of truth, you first must be willing to
doubt as far as possible all things." This is very sage advice, especially
when it comes to believing what you read on the Internet. Most Internet sites
(indeed, books and TV shows too), including this one,
have no form of peer-review (i.e. nobody with experience of the topic checks the
site for accuracy); consequently pretty much anyone can have their own little
corner of cyberspace and information can make it onto websites that is either
misguided, or downright false! When creating material for this site I take
every care to ensure that the information I present is accurate. Invariably
errors will creep in; typos are almost inevitable (although each article goes
through several levels of proof reading before it appears online) and research
is always underway on the species featured here, so the data can go out of date
almost overnight. However, each page has regular (ish!) reviews, during which I
update the information, adding details of new findings and taking
out that which is now thought highly unlikely. You can see most of the books I
have used in the preparation of this site on the
Recommended Reading page and I have provided links to some of the most
interesting sites I came across during my research – these can be found under
the appropriate sub-heading on the
Links page.
Anyway, I digress.... I hope you enjoy looking around the site and I hope
equally that you get something worthwhile out of it. Any comments, suggestions
or (constructive) criticisms are welcome via e-mail - appropriate addresses can
be found on the
Contact page.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCLAIMER: All the
photographs and artwork on this site are either my own work or have been donated by
readers. All images remain property of their authors and, if
you wish to reproduce any of the pictures, consent must be granted by the appropriate
person - requests can be directed via
myself or see
FAQ. For more details on the content of
this site, please see the full WLOL Disclaimer.
TO RETURN TO THE TOP OF THIS PAGE,
CLICK HERE
|